Pitfalls in the hearing

Im deutschen Zivilprozess wird die mündliche Verhandlung durch die Schriftsätze der Parteien vorbereitet. Für den Anwaltsprozess ist dies sogar ausdrücklich in § 129 Abs. 1 ZPO geregelt. Anwaltsprozess bedeutet, dass sich die Parteien eines Rechtsstreites zwingend durch Rechtsanwälte vertreten lassen müssen, um vor Gericht erscheinen und wirksam Prozesshandlungen vornehmen zu können. Auch in Verfahren, in denen sich die Parteien – theoretisch – selbst vertreten könnten (Parteiprozess), wird die mündliche Verhandlung in der Regel durch die Schriftsätze vorbereitet, da sich die Parteien regelmäßig durch Anwälte vertreten lassen werden.

The hearing is initiated by the filing of the application (Section 137 subsection 1 ZPO). The situation is similar in administrative court (Section 103 (3) VwGO), social court (Section 112 subsections 2 and 3 SGG), labour court (Section 46 subsection 2 ArbGG) and fiscal court (Section 92 subsection 3 FGO) proceedings.

However, criminal proceedings are an exception. After the conclusion of the taking of evidence, the representative of the public prosecutor's office and the defence lawyer each make their closing statements. However, the defence lawyer is not obliged to make a specific motion.

Regardless of the type of proceedings, the importance of the oral hearing should not be underestimated. Avoidable mistakes made in the oral hearing can undo all of the lawyer's preparatory work in the written pleadings.

A good lawyer not only internalises the content of the respective files, but also prepares their own clients for an upcoming oral hearing. The client's preparation must, of course, take place within the legal limits.

In detail:

1. in General

Der Angeklagte muss sich vor Gericht zur Sache nicht einlassen. Dem Angeklagten steht das Recht zum Schweigen zu, da niemand gezwungen werden kann, sich selbst zu belasten (lat.: nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare). Dieses Recht ist unabdingbar für ein faires Verfahren (Art. 6 EMRK) und Ausprägung des Rechtsstaatsprinzips.

A defendant only has to provide information about his personal circumstances.

These include:

• the first and last name;
• the birthday;
• the place of birth;
• the marital status;
• the profession;
• the place of residence and
• the nationality.

Macht ein Angeklagter falsche Angaben über seine persönlichen Verhältnisse oder verweigert die Angabe dieser Informationen, so stellt dies eine Ordnungswidrigkeit nach § 111 OWiG dar und kann mit einer Geldbuße von bis zu EUR 1.000,00 geahndet werden.

2. pleading the case

Nach Verlesung der Anklageschrift und der Mitteilung des Gerichts, ob Erörterungen nach den §§ 202a, 212 StPO stattgefunden haben oder nicht, wird der Angeklagte gefragt, ob dieser sich zur Sache (dem Tatvorwurf) äußern möchte.

We can only recommend that every defendant refrain from commenting in any way on the case and thus on the accusation. Experience simply shows that defendants regularly "talk their heads off" during an oral hearing and the associated excitement.

Experience also shows that the courts generally use the defendant's statements against them. If the evidence is thin and an acquittal is "imminent", some judges resort to "bombarding" the defendant with questions. This is done in the hope that the defendant will contradict himself on certain points or make statements about the events before and/or after the offence, which in turn are held against any witness for the defence in order to convict him of an alleged lie.

The more intensively a defendant engages, the more vulnerable he makes himself and his potential defence witnesses.

Unfortunately, we have also seen judges try to ignore the defence lawyer and ask the defendant direct questions about the case and the defendant reacts to this in the excitement. As the defendant, you have to try to keep a cool head. In such a situation, it is advisable to look at the defence lawyer so that he can respond to the question.

In contrast to criminal proceedings, a party to a civil legal dispute does not have the ‘luxury’ of being able to invoke any right to remain silent. Under German civil procedural law, every party is obliged to make a complete and truthful statement of facts in accordance with Section 138 subsection 1 ZPO.

A breach of the duty to tell the truth can lead to the respective party being prosecuted for attempted or completed procedural fraud. If a lawyer intentionally makes untrue statements in favour of their client, this constitutes a criminal offence of aiding and abetting. In the worst case, this can even lead to the lawyer being disbarred.

During an oral hearing, the court may put questions to the parties (Section 141 ZPO). If a party refuses to answer questions, this can be assessed to the detriment of the respective party as part of the free judicial assessment of evidence (Section 286 ZPO). To the extent permitted by law, the parties may also ask each other questions, provided that the question is not merely intended to elicit information.

Investigation always occurs when a party arbitrarily makes any allegations in order to obtain factual information.

In the other jurisdictions, the courts can also hear the parties or parties involved at any time for information on certain matters. The respective client should always be made aware of this so that they can prepare themselves adequately and do not feel taken by surprise.

In view of the above, it should be noted that clients who have little or no court experience in particular must be adequately informed about the course of the hearing. In particular, it should be discussed before an oral hearing what the client should do if they are unsure about how to proceed. After all, it is better to be safe than sorry.

Tolga Topuz
Lawyer

Topuz Law - Law firm from Düsseldorf -